Both groups emphasize that the United States and Mexico
share equal responsibility in the Metales and Derivados case and should
work together to solve the problem. Mexico's failure to aggressively seek
the extradition of Jose Khan, argue the activists, coupled with repeated
violations of environmental regulations by Metales y Deri-vados' U.S. based
parent company (in 1992, New Frontier Trading was discovered transporting
lead waste illegally to the facility on at least 26 different occasions)
provide two good reasons for serious consideration of the case by the CEC.
According to Luna, "this case poses an unprecedented argument, because
not only does it assert environmental neglect on the part of Mexico and
the U.S. company, but it also focuses on the ineffective enforcement on
the part of Mexico to pursue the extradition of Kahn on the criminal level."
If the submission is deemed to satisfy
the criteria of CEC articles 14.1 and 14.2, which govern citizen complaints,
the commission will request a response from the Mexican government. If discrepancies
exist between the two accounts, the CEC could decide to undertake its own
investigation and eventually publish a nonbinding "factual record"
containing its conclusions on the matter. The CEC has received 20 Article-14
submissions since 1995 but has published factual records on only two of
them. If the commission accepts the Metales petition, it would be the first
one to deal with the issue of toxic waste on the border.
But Luna is critical of the Article
14 process. "The CEC doesn't have a time line in terms of when they
have to report [on a submission]," he observed. Recurring complaints
that CEC reviews of citizen petitions can drag on for excessive periods
of time has prompted the institution to rethink its guidelines; the CEC
(Joint Public Advisory Committee) is currently soliciting public comments
on a draft set of revised guidelines, which require deadlines by which the
secretariat must review submissions.
Activists also note, however, that
even with a speedier submission evaluation process, the trinational NAFTA
institution is effectively toothless. The agreement that established the
CEC gave it very limited powers. The institution's Secretariat cannot initiate
investigations or issue its non-judgmental "factual records" on
citizen complaints against NAFTA countries unless authorized to do so by
a governing council made up of the environment ministers from each country.
And because they are beholden first to their government and secondly to
the CEC, the influence domestic political pressures can have on those ministers
is significant. "The [Metales y Derivados] submission is a clear-cut
example of what the CEC was designed to work on," said Luna. "And
we expect them to work on this case."
For all its shortcomings, the Article
14 process does provide environmentalists in Mexico, Canada, and the United
States with a way to focus international attention on issues, sometimes
prompting diplomatic consultations on possible solutions. "The CEC
doesn't have power to do anything ," observed Luna. "At best we
are looking at exposing the problem, bringing the weight of the international
community to bear, and trying to get it dealt with through the ways that
we have." 
Excerpt from the CEC submission
[Supplied by Comité Ciudadano
Pro-Restauración del Cañón del Padre, A.C. and the
EHC]
Purpose of the Petition:
To request the CEC to initiate a
formal investigation to determine Mexico's lack of effective enforcement
of its General Law on Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection (General
Law) Articles 170 and 134, Penal Code Article 415, its Law on International
Extradition Article 3 and the Extradition Treaty Between the United States
of America and the United Mexican States Articles 1 and 2, and;
To request the Secretariat to the
CEC to prepare a report to promote the protection of human health and the
environment and to facilitate enforcement cooperation between governments.
Case which prompts Petition:
Company known as METALES Y DERIVADOS
(Registro Federal de Causantes (RFC) MDM 7202211/2), located at Calle 2
Oriente No. 119, Ciudad Industrial Nueva Tijuana, Tijuana, Baja California,
Mexico. U.S. Parent Company's name: New Frontier Trading Corporation, 3045
Rosecrans #203/4, San Diego, California.
Governmental Agencies Responsible
for the Enforcement and Application of the Law:
La Procuraduría General de
la República (PGR); La Procuraduría Federal de Protección
al Ambiente (PROFEPA); La Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos
Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP); El Instituto Nacional de Ecología (INE);
La Dirección de Ecología del Estado de Baja California.
Petition Assertions:
Mexico has failed to effectively
enforce its General Law on Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection
(General Law) by neglecting to remediate the toxic dump site known as Metales
y Derivados, a U.S.-owned abandoned lead smelter located in Tijuana, Baja
California, Mexico. Specifically:
Mexico has failed to enforce Article
170 of the General Law because it has not taken the proper safety measures
to prevent the Metales y Derivados site from posing an imminent risk to
the ecological balance and to public health.
Mexico has failed to enforce Article
134 of the General Law because it has not taken appropriate actions to control
or prevent soil contamination in and near the Metales y Derivados site.
Mexico has failed to enforce its
laws by not procuring extradition.
|