ENERGY: choosing clean power in California
|
California electricity customers are the first in the country who can
vote green with their utility bills.
|
by Natural Resources Defense Council
|
Where Californians' electricity currently comes from:
35% Natural gas
24% Large hydro
17% Coal
14% Nuclear
11% Renewables
(Due to rounding, the tital is 101%) |
eginning in 1998, California residents
and businesses who are customers of Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern
California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric (about three-quarters
of all California customers) will, for the first time ever, be able to choose
the company that supplies their electricity. Which means that consumers
can also, for the first time, use their buying power to vote for cleaner,
less polluting sources of electric power.
The reason? Electricity industry
restructuring underway across the country. California is the first state
to put utility competition into effect, but several other states will soon
follow. As competition comes to California, so too do new competitors, and
many are marketing their power supplies as environmentally beneficial. And
not only are there new companies to choose from, but many companies offer
several different energy mixes, which differ in price and in the types of
resources used to generate the electricity. Sound confusing? It is! So we've
evaluated the options in order to help you choose.
|
Choose wisely, but choose!
|
|
If you want to reduce the impact
your electricity use has on the environment, the worst choice you can make
is no choice. No choice means you will receive the current California mix
of power resources which is dirtier than any of the energy supplies we reviewed.
By choosing cleaner power, you'll be sending a message to companies that
they should invest more heavily in less polluting energy sources. |
NRDC's evaluation criteria
|
|
NRDC conducted an independent evaluation
of all (to the best of our knowledge) energy mixes currently being marketed
in California as environmentally beneficial, using the criteria set forth
below. |
|
1. The amount of renewable energy sources in the mix
To qualify as a renewable in our
evaluation, the resource must be one of the following:
|
|
- Solar
- Wind
- Geothermal · Sustainable biomass
- Environmentally-sound hydro
|
|
2. The amount of new renewables in the mix
New renewable facilities received
extra value in our evaluation. While continued support of existing renewable
capacity is crucial to the health of the industry, we want to encourage
investment in new resources that will grow the renewables industry and make
these environmentally preferable resources a bigger part of our electricity
mix. We considered as new any renewable project that first generated electricity
on or after September 26, 1996 the date of the enactment of California's
utility restructuring legislation.
|
|
3. The amount and type of nonrenewable resources in the mix
Non-renewables will be a part of
most electricity marketed as "green power," at least initially.
Therefore our criteria did not disqualify products that rely on some non-renewable
resources as long as the non-renewable portion of the mix does not contain
a higher percentage of nuclear or coal than the current California resource
mix, or greater emissions of carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides or sulfur dioxide.
|
|
4. Disclosure
Our evaluation also took into account
the quality and quantity of information that the company is making available
to consumers about its energy mix.
|
The results
|
|
Based on currently available data
supplied by the electric suppliers themselves, we've identified six different
electricity "products" or energy mixes from four different companies
as environmentally preferable choices. We did not attempt to rank the six
products against one another.
Our listing of a product as environmentally
preferable does not imply that it received a perfect score when measured
against our criteria. All six of these energy mixes do, however, have substantially
lower environmental impacts than the current California mix, and represent
the "greenest" power options currently available.
|
The choices
|
|
The products are listed here in alphabetical
order, not in order of environmental performance. NRDC's identification
of these energy choices as environmentally preferable does not constitute
an endorsement of any company or its products.
Enron's Earth Smart Power (800) 847-3366
Green Mountain's Energy Resources
(888) 246-6730
PG&ES's Clean Choice 50 (888)
743-1700
PG&ES's Clean Choice 100
SMUD's (Sacramento Municipal Utility
District) Greenergy Solar (916) 452-7811
SMUD's Greenergy
|
Renewable ...
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9cd6/b9cd61c0b494445c1dc74ac3b8e836dd089d31af" alt="" |
A couple of notes about price: as
of now, renewable energy is more expensive 10-20 percent more than the standard
mix (it's worth it!). But electricity rates in California went down 10 percent
in January, so you could very well end up paying about the same for clean
energy this year as you did for dirtier power last year. You should also
be aware that as part of the California utility restructuring legislation,
funds were set aside to help offset the higher cost of renewable resources,
so if you choose renewables, you may be eligible for a credit on your bill.
Ask your electricity provider for more information. And one sure way to
cut your electric bill is by cutting your electricity use through energy
efficiency measures.
NRDC will establish and apply more detailed criteria as the market develops and more information becomes available, and will continually update their website: http://www.nrdc.org/howto/encagp.html#choose or contact them at nrdcinfo nrdc.org or 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011; (212) 727-2700.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18fe2/18fe281bface73c01d034085f67244f5b5eb367b" alt=""
|