Warmer world will be a sicker world, say scientists
provided by SeaWeb
lobal warming and changing climatic conditions are triggering disease epidemics in wildlife around the world, reports a renowned team of ecologists and epidemiologists in the Friday June 21st issue of Science. The outbreaks are occurring in habitats ranging from coral reefs to rainforests.
This comprehensive two-year study, coming out of the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS), is the first to analyze disease epidemics across entire plant and animal systems, both on land and in the oceans. The study investigates these recent disease outbreaks and examines the mechanisms related to temperature or seasonality changes that could influence them. What is most surprising is the fact that climate-sensitive outbreaks are happening with so many different types of pathogens viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites as well as in such a wide range of hosts including corals, oysters, terrestrial plants, birds, and humans, says lead author Drew Harvell of Cornell University.
This isn't just a question of coral bleaching for a few marine ecologists, nor just a question of malaria for a few health officials the number of similar increases in disease incidence is astonishing, says coauthor Richard Ostfeld from the Institute of Ecosystem Studies in Millbrook New York. We don't want to be alarmist, but we are alarmed.
The team of experts has concluded that there are common themes likely linked to global warming. Climate change is disrupting natural ecosystems in a way that is making life better for infectious diseases, states epidemiologist Andrew Dobson of Princeton University. The accumulation of evidence has us extremely worried. We share diseases with some of these species. The risk for humans is going up.
The team documented examples of viruses, bacteria, and fungi associated with diseases that develop more rapidly with slight rises in temperature. Many vectors of disease such as mosquitoes, ticks, and rodents, as well as the viral, fungal, and bacterial pathogens, are highly temperature and moisture sensitive. As temperatures increase, these carriers are likely to spread into new areas and may have potentially devastating effects on wildlife populations that have not been previously exposed. Reproduction, growth, and biting rates of insects all go up with increases of temperature. Winter is the limiting time for many pathogens, killing back populations each year. With milder winters, this population bottleneck may be removed for many species. Warmer, longer summers also mean that the period of time of disease transmission is longer. Warmer summers may increase host susceptibility to diseases due to thermal stress, particularly in the oceans. Marine bacteria and fungal growth rates are positively correlated with increasing temperature.
Some examples of disease outbreaks and their climate related links include:
Expanding Range of Disease Carriers due to Temperature
Expanding Range of Disease Carriers due to Moisture
Increased Susceptibility to Disease
Biodiversity buffers disease outbreaks
The diseases we should be most worried about are the vector transmitted diseases, says Dobson. As temperature warms, insects carrying disease from the tropics are spreading towards the poles. In tropical areas, there is a greater diversity of species, but smaller numbers of individuals of each. This dilutes the spread of pathogens between species. In temperate areas, disease can hit harder. There are fewer numbers of species but many more individuals, making them more vulnerable to epidemics.
With higher levels of biodiversity, there is a greater chance that a mosquito will bite a species in which the disease doesn't develop. In temperate areas, vectors have fewer choices about what to bite. As biodiversity decreases there is less and less buffering. Thus, any pathogen that manages to spread from the tropics to the temperate zone in a warmer world is likely to have a bigger impact as it can focus on a few common and abundant susceptible species... maybe even us! says Dobson.
Pathogens have also contributed to declines of threatened species such as lions, cranes, vultures, and black-footed ferrets, among others. Human destruction of biodiversity makes this a double whammy it means we are exacerbating the problem, says Dobson.
Lines of Defense
The authors acknowledge that response to their findings will be controversial and politicized. There are still people resistant to the idea of climate change at all, others will say it is hard to predict what type of outbreaks will occur or where they will happen, says Dobson. This is true. Very little monitoring and few long-term studies exist. What is apparent is the end result when the epidemic strikes. When they do, little is known about how to respond and that needs to change say the authors.
Baseline disease data are critical. And while forecasting epidemics in crop diseases has received much attention, and the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has a sea surface temperature monitoring system for coral bleaching, there are no disease forecasting models for threatened wildlife populations or management protocols for infectious diseases.
We need to develop lines of defense, says Harvell. Now that we know these epidemics are arising, what can we do about it? It's highly likely to get worse with increasing temperature.
Besides HIV funding, there is very little research money going towards infectious disease work and training. The scary thing about the recent anthrax threat was not just that it happened but how few people know anything about infectious diseases, and how little even these people know about their dynamics, says Dobson. We need to pay better attention to this issue in an increasingly unnatural world. To improve our ability to predict epidemics in wild populations, it will be necessary to separate the independent and interactive effects of numerous climate related influences on diseases. Development of disease protocols in response to break outs are essential.
We have to get serious about global change, says Dobson. It's not only going to be a warmer world, it's going to be a sicker world.